Skip to content
The Use of Research Evidence
A Methods Repository
  • Home
  • Build and Add Your Protocol
  • URE Resource Center
  • About Us
  • Social Media
    • Follow Us On Twitter @uremethods
    • URE Methods Repository YouTube Channel
  • FAQ

Critical Perspectives

  • Kara Finnigan: The Political and Social Contexts of Research Evidence Use in Partnerships
  • Ruth Stewart et al.: Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order?
  • Mark Rickinson and Marcia McKenzie: Understanding the research-policy relationship in ESE: insights from the critical policy and evidence use literatures
  • David E. Kirkland: No Small Matters: Reimagining the Use of Research Evidence From A Racial Justice Perspective
  • Caitlin Farrell, et al.: Conceptions and Practices of Equity in Research-Practice Partnerships
  • Fabienne Doucet: Centering the Margins: (Re)defining Useful Research Evidence Through Critical Perspectives
  • Karen Bogenschneider: Engaging Policymakers: A New Era of Research and Theory That Builds on the Basics

Methodological Perspectives

  • Itzhak Yanovitzky: Why Should We Study the Use of Research Evidence as a Behavior?
  • Mark Rickinson, et al.: Using Research Well: A Framework for Understanding Quality Use of Research Evidence
  • William Penuel and Anna-Ruth Allen: To Study Conceptual Use of Research, Consider Tradeoffs Among Methods
  • Zachary P. Neal et al.: Just Google it: measuring schools’ use of research evidence with internet search results
  • Jennifer Lawlor, et al.: Approaches to measuring use of research evidence in K-12 settings: A systematic review
  • Drew Gitomer and Kevin Crouse: Studying the Use of Research Evidence: A Review of Methods
  • Barbara Davidson, Julie Greenberg, and Susan Pimental: Avoiding Confirmation Bias When Implementing Evidence-Based Instructional Practices
  • Max Crowley and Taylor Scott: Congressional Use of Evidence Can Be Improved: Reflections from a Trial of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration Model
  • Karen Bogenschneider: Fresh Insights on Measuring Research Use: Policymaker Perspectives on How Theory Falls Short
  • Lorraine McDonnell and Stephen Weatherford: Expanding the Definition of Evidence in Studies on the Use of Research Evidence in Policy
  • Drew Gitomer and Kevin Crouse: Studying the Use of Research Evidence: A Review of Methods

Historical and Current Concepts

  • Vivian Tseng and Cynthia Coburn: Using Evidence in the US
  • Vivian Tseng: Research on Research Use: Building Theory, Empirical Evidence, and a Global Field (WT Grant Digest, Issue 7)
  • Larry V. Hedges: Challenges in building usable knowledge in education
  • Elizabeth N. Farley-Ripple, Kathryn Oliver and Annette Boaz: Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
  • Home
  • Study of URE: Methods Literature Catalog

Karen Bogenschneider: Engaging Policymakers: A New Era of Research and Theory That Builds on the Basics

A new era of theory furnishes the explanatory frameworks it will take to make researchers more effective across policy settings. Community Dissonance Theory conceptualizes researchers and policymakers as two separate communities that confront different questions of interest, employ different decision-making processes, and speak different languages (Bogenschneider & Corbett, 2021; Bogenschneider, Corbett, & Parrott, 2019). The theory’s foundational premise is that researchers can more effectively engage policymakers if they begin with the basics of better understanding the policy community—its inhabitants, institutions, and culture.

Read the full article here: http://wtgrantfoundation.org/engaging-policymakers-a-new-era-of-research-and-theory-that-builds-on-the-basics

Connect with the author on Twitter:

Karen Bogenschneider: @fampolicy

decision-making, framework, policymakers, policymaking